Premium
Journal editors impasse with outcome reporting bias
Author(s) -
DalRé Rafael,
Caplan Arthur L.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
european journal of clinical investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.164
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1365-2362
pISSN - 0014-2972
DOI - 10.1111/eci.12484
Subject(s) - outcome (game theory) , transparency (behavior) , reporting bias , clinical trial , publication bias , medline , medicine , actuarial science , psychology , business , computer science , political science , computer security , economics , law , mathematical economics
key pointsSeveral requirements and regulations have been issued to promote clinical trial transparency through prospective registration of trials, disclosure of results, access to trial reports submitted to regulatory agencies and access to anonymized patient‐level data. Clinical trial results are disseminated through articles. Yet, many present outcome reporting bias. Open access to trial data will help to deter outcome reporting bias. However, this is not enough to clinicians. Access to trial protocols by journal staff has proven rather inefficacious in preventing outcome reporting bias. Two proposals have been suggested or implemented to tackle outcome reporting bias that are discussed in this article. Editors should implement quality‐control processes aiming at preventing outcome reporting bias. Readers should be informed as to the efficiency of the implemented process.