z-logo
Premium
Superior vena cava–right atrium junction flow‐pattern post‐transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale
Author(s) -
Yalonetsky Sergey,
Tal Roi,
Aharonson Doron,
Gross Gil,
Lorber Avraham
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/echo.14448
Subject(s) - patent foramen ovale , medicine , right atrium , cardiology , superior vena cava , migraine
Background The patent foramen ovale ( PFO ) occluder is a bulky metallic device. Its impact on the normal blood flow at the superior vena cava–right atrial ( SVC ‐ RA ) junction is not clear. Methods We examined SVC ‐ RA junction flow‐pattern using pulsed‐wave ( PW ) ultrasound Doppler in 21 patients (4 male, aged 52.7 ± 9 years) who underwent PFO device closure 4–120 months previously, in comparison with 21 age‐ and sex‐matched controls (4 male, aged 51 ± 8.5 years) with structurally normal hearts. Results Mean systolic flow velocity at the SVC ‐ RA junction was 60 ± 11 cm/s in the PFO closure group and 64 ± 17 cm/s in the control group ( P  = 0.27). Mean diastolic blood flow velocity at the SVC ‐ RA junction in those groups was 30 ± 8 and 35 ± 9 cm/s, respectively ( P  = 0.1).The mean systolic wave duration was 439 ± 52 ms in the PFO closure group and 422 ± 67 ms in the control group ( P  = 0.4). The mean diastolic wave duration was 320 ± 75 and 277 ± 88 ms, respectively ( P  = 0.12). Conclusion The study results show that transcatheter PFO closure does not affect the normal blood flow at the SVC ‐ RA junction.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom