z-logo
Premium
Value of three‐dimensional speckle‐tracking imaging in detecting left ventricular systolic function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
Author(s) -
He Jionghong,
Yang Long
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/echo.14427
Subject(s) - ejection fraction , cardiology , medicine , dilated cardiomyopathy , magnetic resonance imaging , ventricle , cardiac magnetic resonance imaging , diastole , cardiomyopathy , end diastolic volume , stroke volume , heart failure , radiology , blood pressure
Objective To explore the value of three‐dimensional speckle‐tracking imaging (3 DSTI ) in detecting left ventricular systolic function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy ( DCM ). Methods Totally 31 DCM patients were enrolled in this study. Left ventricular end‐systolic volume ( LVESV ), left ventricular end‐diastolic volume ( LVEDV ), and left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ) were measured using the 3 DSTI , two‐dimensional echocardiography (2 DE ), and magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ). Left ventricular end‐diastolic mass ( ED mass) and left ventricular end‐diastolic mass index ( LVED mass I) were also detected by 3 DSTI and MRI . The differences in these measurements were analyzed and compared. Results The values of LVESV , LVEDV , and LVEF showed significantly positive correlations among 2 DE group, 3 DSTI group, and MRI group. The LVEF value showed significant difference among these three groups [(33.3 ± 11.1)%, (30.3 ± 10.6)%, and (26.2 ± 10.7)%; P  =   0.04], whereas LVEDV and LVESV values were not significantly different ( P  > 0.05; respectively). Inter‐group comparison showed the mean of LVEF was significantly lower in MRI group than in 2 DE group ( P  =   0.031), whereas there was no significant difference between 2 DE group and 3 DSTI group and between 3 DSTI group and MRI group ( P  > 0.05; respectively). The ED mass and ED massI detected by 3 DSTI and MRI were (143.2 ± 40.2) g vs (190.0 ± 58.3) g and (83.2 ± 21.1) g/m 2 vs (110.1 ± 29.7) g/m 2 ( P  <   0.001; respectively). Conclusions The LVEF value detected by 3 DSTI is closer to that detected by MRI in DCM patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom