z-logo
Premium
Latent myopathy is more pronounced in patients with low flow versus normal flow aortic stenosis with normal left ventricular ejection fraction who are undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement: Multicenter study with a brief review of the literature
Author(s) -
Supariwala Azhar,
SanchezRoss Monica,
Suma Valentin,
Seetharam Karthik,
Marrero Daniel,
Swistel Daniel,
Balaram Sandhya,
Chaudhry Farooq A.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/echo.13839
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , cardiology , aortic valve replacement , myopathy , stenosis , aortic valve , aortic valve stenosis , stroke volume , heart failure
Background Midwall fibrosis and low stroke volume are independent predictors of mortality in severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved LV ejection fraction ( LVEF ). The role of speckle tracking echocardiography ( STE ) to identify latent myopathy pre‐ and post‐ aortic valve replacement ( AVR ) in high risk AS patients with normal LVEF is limited. Methods Demographic, 2D echocardiographic, and STE data were analyzed in patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF who underwent tissue AVR . Velocity vector imaging ( VVI ) was used to assess regional and global peak systolic longitudinal strain ( GLS ). Low flow ( LF ) was defined as an indexed LV stroke volume <35 mL/m 2 . Results Between December 2008 and May 2011, 37 patients (75 ± 9 years, 51% male) had both pre‐ and post‐ AVR echos within 6.6 ± 6.5 months (median = 4 months; range = 2.5–9.5) of surgery. Compared with pre‐ AVR , GLS (−6.9 ± 4.9% vs −11.1 ± 4.1%; P  < .001) and strain rate (−0.72 ± 0.3s ‐1 vs −0.87 ± 0.3s ‐1 ; P  = .01) improved post‐ AVR . Pre‐ AVR mid‐segments showed a similar myopathy as the basal segments (−9.5 ± 4.3% vs −9.0 ± 4.2%; P  = .3). The 16 (43%) LF patients in this study had lower pre‐ and post‐ AVR strain compared to NF patients (GLS Pre‐ AVR : LF vs NF : −5.1 ± 4.1% vs −8.4 ± 4.9% ( P  = .04) and GLS Post‐ AVR : LF vs NF : −9.2 ± 3.7% vs −12.5 ± 3.9% ( P  = .01)). However, there was no difference in absolute and %change improvement in GLS post‐ AVR ( LF vs NF :∆ −4.2 ± 3.5% vs ∆−4.1 ± 5.3% ( P  = .90) and 193 ± 214% vs 143 ± 230% change ( P  = .5)). The lowest GLS was seen in LF / HG AS followed by LF / LG , NF / LG and NF / HG AS ; P  = .03. Conclusions Latent myopathy is more pronounced in LF AS both pre‐ and post‐ AVR . Our study provides evidence of improvement in myopathy in LF AS despite a persistent worse myopathy compared to NF patients post‐ AVR .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom