z-logo
Premium
Layer‐specific global longitudinal strain reveals impaired cardiac function in patients with reversible ischemia
Author(s) -
Hagemann Christoffer E.,
Hoffmann Søren,
Olsen Flemming J.,
Jørgensen Peter G.,
FritzHansen Thomas,
Jensen Jan S.,
BieringSørensen Tor
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/echo.13830
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , cardiology , coronary artery disease , single photon emission computed tomography , ischemia , stenosis , angina , spect imaging , speckle tracking echocardiography , nuclear medicine , myocardial infarction , heart failure
Aims Two‐dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2 DSTE ) detects early signs of left ventricular dysfunction; however, it is unknown whether layer‐specific global longitudinal strain ( GLS ) has incremental value in diagnosis of patients with reversible ischemia assessed by single photon emission computed tomography ( SPECT ). Methods and Results Eighty patients with stable angina pectoris ( SAP ), normal left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ), and no history of ischemic heart disease were retrospectively identified to have been examined by 2 DSTE , SPECT , and coronary angiography ( CAG ). Patients with a normal SPECT constituted the control group, and patients with a positive SPECT were divided into patients with or without (true‐ or false‐ positive SPECT ) significant stenosis assessed by CAG . GLS was measured for two myocardial layers (endocardial and epicardial) and as well as mid‐myocardial GLS . Patients with reversible ischemia had significantly lower GLS compared to the control group ( GLS E ndocardial : −19.0 ± 4.4% vs −21.4 ± 3.7%, P  = .011; GLS E picardial : −14.3 ± 2.9% vs −16.3 ± 2.9%, P  = .004); GLS M id‐myocardial : −16.5 ± 3.6% vs −18.6 ± 3.2%, P  = .006. This difference was even more evident in patients with a true‐positive SPECT ( GLS E ndocardial : −18.0 ± 4.4% vs −21.4 ± 3.7%, P  < .001; GLS E picardial : −13.6 ± 3.0% vs −16.3 ± 2.9%, P  < .001); GLS M id‐myocardial : −15.6 ± 3.6% vs −18.6 ± 3.2%, P  < .001. Notably, no significant differences existed in patients with a false‐positive SPECT . GLS E picardial was the only independent predictor of coronary artery disease. In conclusion In patients with SAP and preserved LVEF , layer‐specific GLS at rest identifies patients with reversible ischemia. This seems to be evident only in patients with a true‐positive SPECT , thus, 2 DSTE at rest might improve the diagnostic accuracy of a positive SPECT .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom