Premium
Simultaneous Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion, Wall Motion, and Deformation during Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: A Feasibility Study
Author(s) -
Zoppellaro Giacomo,
Venneri Lucia,
Khattar Rajdeep S.,
Li Wei,
Senior Roxy
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/echo.13190
Subject(s) - medicine , perfusion , contrast (vision) , ultrasound , ejection fraction , reproducibility , nuclear medicine , perfusion scanning , radiology , contrast enhanced ultrasound , cardiology , artificial intelligence , heart failure , mathematics , computer science , statistics
Aims Ultrasound contrast agents may be used for the assessment of regional wall motion and myocardial perfusion, but are generally considered not suitable for deformation analysis. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of deformation imaging on contrast‐enhanced images using a novel methodology. Methods and Results We prospectively enrolled 40 patients who underwent stress echocardiography with continuous intravenous infusion of SonoVue for the assessment of myocardial perfusion imaging with flash replenishment technique. We compared longitudinal strain (Lε) values, assessed with a vendor‐independent software (2D CPA ), on 68 resting contrast‐enhanced and 68 resting noncontrast recordings. Strain analysis on contrast recordings was evaluated in the first cardiac cycles after the flash. Tracking of contrast images was deemed feasible in all subjects and in all views. Contrast administration improved image quality and increased the number of segments used for deformation analysis. Lε of noncontrast and contrast‐enhanced images were statistically different (−18.8 ± 4.5% and −22.8 ± 5.4%, respectively; P < 0.001), but their correlation was good ( ICC 0.65, 95% CI 0.42–0.78). Patients with resting wall‐motion abnormalities showed lower Lε values on contrast recordings (−18.6 ± 6.0% vs. −24.2 ± 5.5%, respectively; P < 0.01). Intra‐operator and inter‐operator reproducibility was good for both noncontrast and contrast images with no statistical differences. Conclusions Our study shows that deformation analysis on postflash contrast‐enhanced images is feasible and reproducible. Therefore, it would be possible to perform a simultaneous evaluation of wall‐motion abnormalities, volumes, ejection fraction, perfusion defects, and cardiac deformation on the same contrast recording.