Premium
Effects of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Delivered through a Graft Vessel for Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction and Chronic Heart Failure: An Echocardiographic Study of Left Atrium Function
Author(s) -
Qi Zhi,
Liu Sheng,
Lv Xiuzhang,
Duan Fujian,
Wang Hao,
Gao Yiming,
Wang Jianpeng
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/echo.12883
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , cardiology , myocardial infarction , artery , heart failure , ischemic cardiomyopathy , infarction , bone marrow , cardiac function curve , surgery
Objectives The graft of stem cells to treat ischemic cardiomyopathy is popular in many clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of isolated coronary artery bypass graft combined with bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC) delivered through the graft vessels to improve left atrium (LA) function of patients with previous myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure using echocardiography. Methods Forty‐two patients with previous myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) only (18 in CABG group) or CABG with BMMNC transplantation (24 in CABG + BMMNC group). Echocardiographic parameters were measured on two‐dimensional (2D) imaging, three‐dimensional imaging, 2D strain, and strain rate imaging, eight parameters were measured totally. Results Postoperative LA global strain (LAGS) versus Preoperative LAGS were 24.875 ± 1.588% versus 14.250 ± 1.281% (P < 0.05) in CABG + BMMMNC group and 17.556 ± 1.834% versus 13.111 ± 1.479% (P < 0.05) in CABG group, LVEF was 49.083 ± 1.914% versus 36.042 ± 1.185% (P < 0.05) in CABG + BMMMNC group and 41.389 ± 2.210% versus 34.667 ± 1.369% (P < 0.05) in CABG group, and LA volume (LAV) was 15.651 ± 0.631 mL versus 23.894 ± 0.831 mL (P < 0.05) in CABG + BMMMNC group and 21.429 ± 0.707 mL versus 22.379 ± 0.959 mL (P < 0.05) in CABG group. LAGS, LVEF, and LAV were significantly improved postoperatively in both groups. The degree of the improvement was significantly different between the two groups with the CABG + BMMNC group improved more versus the group of CABG only (P < 0.05). Postoperative LVEDV and LVESV were significantly improved compared with those obtained prior to operation in CABG + BMMNC group (P < 0.05). Conclusions The improvement of LA function in CABG + BMMNC group is better than CABG group. 2D strain imaging is a more sensitive tool to evaluate LA function.