z-logo
Premium
The Value of Aneurysm Volume and Myocardial Strain Rate for Evaluating Cardiac Function of Ischemia‐Related Left Ventricular Aneurysm in a Rabbit Model Using Real Time Three‐Dimensional Echocardiographic Imaging Combined with Speckle Tracking Imaging
Author(s) -
Zhai Hong,
Mu Yuming,
Guan Lina,
Li Yanhong
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/echo.12144
Subject(s) - ejection fraction , medicine , cardiology , left ventricular aneurysm , stroke volume , aneurysm , ventricular aneurysm , end diastolic volume , artery , end systolic volume , heart failure , radiology , myocardial infarction
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of left ventricular aneurysm ( LVA ) volume and myocardial strain on left ventricular function in a rabbit model using real time three‐dimensional echocardiographic imaging ( RT‐3DE ) combined with two‐dimensional speckle tracking imaging ( 2D‐STI ). Methods A rabbit model of LVA was prepared in 30 N ew Z ealand rabbits by ligating the middle segment of the left anterior descending artery and the left circumflex artery ( LVA group); 10 control rabbits underwent thoracotomy alone. Four weeks later, RT‐3DE was performed to obtain data on left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ), left ventricular end‐diastolic volume ( LVEDV ), left ventricular end‐systolic volume ( LVESV ), and LVA volume. The peak short‐axis radial ( SrR ) and circumferential ( SrC ) strain rates were measured using 2D‐STI technique. Results Compared with control rabbits, LVA group rabbits had significant left ventricular enlargement at the end‐systolic and end‐diastolic phases (both P < 0.05). LVEF , SrR ‐ S ystolic, and SrC ‐ S ystolic were significantly lower in the LVA group (all P < 0.05). Moreover, there were high correlations between LVEF and SrC ‐ S ystolic anterior wall , SrR ‐ S ystolic anterior wall , SrC ‐ S ystolic lateral wall , and SrR ‐ S ystolic lateral wall (r = −0.895, −0.887, −0.890, −0.891, respectively, all P < 0.05). Of note, LVA volume/ LVEDV had the tightest inverse relationship with LVEF (r = −0.911, P < 0.01). Specifically, LVA volume/ LVEDV >16% corresponded to LVEF <50%, and LVEF decreased 1.1% while LVA volume/ LVEDV increased 1%. Conclusions LVA volume/ LVEDV provided a sensitive indicator reflecting cardiac function with LVA . Measurement of various parameters using RT‐3DE might be a useful means to evaluate cardiac function after LVA formation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom