z-logo
Premium
Who Benefits from Misleading Advertising?
Author(s) -
Hattori Keisuke,
Higashida Keisaku
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
economica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.532
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1468-0335
pISSN - 0013-0427
DOI - 10.1111/ecca.12149
Subject(s) - misinformation , competition (biology) , advertising , allocative efficiency , business , welfare , dilemma , quality (philosophy) , consumer welfare , economic surplus , economics , microeconomics , marketing , computer science , computer security , epistemology , biology , market economy , ecology , philosophy
Considering a model of price and misleading advertising competition between two brands producing horizontally and vertically differentiated brands, we investigate allocative implications of misinformation and related regulatory policies. Although misinformation distorts consumers' decision‐making, misinformation can correct inefficiencies resulting from misallocation of goods, thereby increasing welfare. However, advertising competition may create a prisoner's dilemma for firms and reduce welfare, but smart consumers unaffected by misinformation and consumers preferring low‐quality brands may gain. We also demonstrate how a biased policymaker who places different weights on producers' and consumers' surpluses behaves in response to misinformation disseminated by firms.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here