z-logo
Premium
Validation of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ ‐ BN 20 for patients with brain cancer
Author(s) -
Zhang K.,
Tian J.,
He Z.,
Sun W.,
Pekbay B.,
Lin Y.,
Wu D.,
Zhang J.,
Chen P.,
Guo H.,
Wan Y.,
Wang M.,
Yang S.,
Zheng J.,
Zhang L.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
european journal of cancer care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1365-2354
pISSN - 0961-5423
DOI - 10.1111/ecc.12832
Subject(s) - medicine , cronbach's alpha , quality of life (healthcare) , discriminant validity , reliability (semiconductor) , correlation , cancer , physical therapy , oncology , internal consistency , clinical psychology , psychometrics , nursing , power (physics) , physics , geometry , mathematics , quantum mechanics
This is a single centre study in mainland China aiming to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ ‐ BN 20, designed by The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group to evaluate the life quality of patients with brain tumour, cancer or metastases. One hundred and eighty‐eight patients with primary or secondary brain cancer from Hunan Provincial Tumor Hospital during September 2013 to June 2014 completed the Chinese EORTC QLQ ‐C30/ BN 20 questionnaires developed by translation, back translation and cultural adaptation. Results were statistically analysed using SPSS 17.0. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient) was between .753 and .869, the correlation coefficients among items and its own dimension were bigger than .4, and all items had a better correlation with its own dimension. The Spearman was used to analyse the correlation of each dimension between EORTC QLQ ‐ BN 20 and EORTC QLQ ‐C30, and the result showed that individual dimensions were moderately correlated, other dimensions were weakly correlated. In conclusion, the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ BN 20 questionnaire had great relevance, reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. It provides a valuable tool for the assessment of health‐related quality of life in clinical studies of Chinese patients with primary or secondary brain cancer.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here