z-logo
Premium
Treatment modality selection and prognosis of early stage small cell lung cancer: retrospective analysis from a single cancer institute
Author(s) -
Zhu H.,
Zhou Z.,
Xue Q.,
Zhang X.,
He J.,
Wang L.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
european journal of cancer care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1365-2354
pISSN - 0961-5423
DOI - 10.1111/ecc.12082
Subject(s) - medicine , carboplatin , etoposide , lung cancer , chemotherapy , stage (stratigraphy) , radiation therapy , hazard ratio , surgery , cisplatin , multivariate analysis , retrospective cohort study , oncology , confidence interval , paleontology , biology
We evaluated the role of surgery followed by either chemotherapy ( ChT ) alone or chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy ( ChT/TRT ) versus sequential ChT/TRT in patients with clinical stage I or stage II small cell lung cancer ( SCLC ). Ninety‐six patients received surgery (complete resection) followed by either ChT alone or ChT/TRT ( G roup I ), while 49 patients were treated exclusively with sequential ChT/TRT ( G roup II ). The ChT regimens consisted of either carboplatin/etoposide or cisplatin/etoposide. The total TRT dose was 50–60  Gy . For the whole group ( n = 145), the median survival time was 54 months, and the 5‐year overall survival ( OS ) rate was 48%. The corresponding figures for G roup I were 91 months and 57%, respectively, and for G roup II , they were 34.6 months and 31.4% respectively ( P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that a K arnofsky P erformance S tatus score ≥ 80 [hazard ratio ( HR ), 0.281; P = 0.015] and the treatment modality including surgery ( HR , 0.503; P = 0.004) were independent favourable prognostic factors for OS .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom