Premium
Effectiveness and tolerability of treatment for isolated actinic keratoses: A retrospective comparison between cryotherapy, CO 2 laser and 5‐fluorouracil 0.5%/salicylic acid 10%
Author(s) -
Conforti Claudio,
Giuffrida Roberta,
Dianzani Caterina,
Guarneri Fabrizio,
Marangi Giovanni Francesco,
Neagu Nicoleta,
Persichetti Paolo,
Zalaudek Iris,
di Meo Nicola
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
dermatologic therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.595
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1529-8019
pISSN - 1396-0296
DOI - 10.1111/dth.14846
Subject(s) - medicine , cryotherapy , tolerability , erythema , dermatology , fluorouracil , actinic keratosis , basal cell , surgery , retrospective cohort study , adverse effect , chemotherapy
Actinic keratoses (AK) have been described as either intraepithelial keratinocytic dysplasia that can evolve into invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or as in situ SCC that can progress into an invasive form. A retrospective study was conducted to compare outcomes of three different topical therapies for patients with single AK (<4): cryotherapy, CO 2 laser and 5‐fluorouracil 0.5%/salicylic acid 10%. We included 72 patients who presented at the Dermatology Clinic of Maggiore Hospital of Trieste between 1 November 2019 and 31 January 2020 for the treatment of AKs. All treatments led to a significant reduction in the average diameter of AK. Pain felt by patients was significantly lower after 5‐FU 0.5%/SA 10%. Side effects appeared similarly distributed among the three groups, with erythema and crusts being the most frequent. Aesthetic outcomes were highest in the 5‐FU 5%/SA 10% group, as evaluated by both the patient and the operator. Cryotherapy, CO 2 laser and 5‐FU 5%/SA 10% were all effective, with no significant efficacy differences among them. Additionally, 5‐FU 5%/SA 10% was proved to have the best aesthetic result and to cause the least pain, while necessitating long‐term administration. This should be taken into account for patients with low pain tolerance and low treatment adherence. Cryotherapy and CO 2 laser have the advantage of requiring a single session, which might be more suitable for uncooperative patients.