z-logo
Premium
How to promote institutional reforms in the agricultural sector? A case study of Uganda's National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS)
Author(s) -
Rwamigisa Patience B.,
Birner Regina,
Mangheni Margaret N.,
Semana Arseni
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
development policy review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.671
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1467-7679
pISSN - 0950-6764
DOI - 10.1111/dpr.12318
Subject(s) - mindset , agricultural extension , corporate governance , agriculture , politics , vulnerability (computing) , process (computing) , business , economics , economic system , public administration , economic growth , public economics , political science , finance , ecology , philosophy , computer security , epistemology , computer science , law , biology , operating system
Abstract This study provides alternative explanations to the limited success of the National Agricultural Advisory Services ( NAADS ) programme in Uganda, which was considered a role model for a demand‐driven, decentralized and market‐oriented agricultural extension reform in Africa. The analysis shows that the reform process was shaped by the interaction of two coalitions of actors: a donor‐dominated coalition that pushed for radical reform and advocated the total overhaul of the existing structures and the creation of new ones, with the aim of changing the mindset of the extension workers and managers towards the adoption of a more efficient, farmer‐oriented and performance‐based system. The other was a domestic coalition that believed in a “gradual” or “incremental” approach to promote changes and adjustments in the existing system to make it more efficient and accountable. This group was opposed to the complete overhaul of the existing extension system—taking an apparently more conservative stance. The study shows that the exclusion of the gradual reform coalition in the design and early implementation of NAADS increased the vulnerability of the programme to political capture and governance problems.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here