Premium
Kurdish–Iraqi state conflict (de‐)escalation following the independence referendum
Author(s) -
Hama Hawre Hasan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
digest of middle east studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.225
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1949-3606
pISSN - 1060-4367
DOI - 10.1111/dome.12240
Subject(s) - intervention (counseling) , affect (linguistics) , independence (probability theory) , political science , referendum , dilemma , state (computer science) , law and economics , existentialism , moral hazard , hazard , political economy , social psychology , law , sociology , economics , psychology , politics , microeconomics , incentive , philosophy , statistics , mathematics , communication , epistemology , algorithm , psychiatry , computer science , chemistry , organic chemistry
Moral hazard theory assumes that the responsibility to protect (R2P) raises expectations of third‐party intervention, thus creating a perverse motivation for vulnerable groups to act aggressively and incite a situation where foreign intervention becomes necessary to preserve their own safety. The promise of external intervention encourages vulnerable groups to rebel against their parent states under the assumption that intervention increases the likelihood of success and lowers the expected cost. Alan Kuperman describes moral hazard theory as the taking of risks that may inadvertently derive from trying to protect from risk, with unwanted results. This paper asks, if there are divisions, conflicts, or a security dilemma arising between factional leaders within a vulnerable group, how does that affect the decisions of the group with regard to taking risks? Taking the case of the PUK’s decision not to fight Iraqi armed forces and thereby prevent conflict escalation following the 2017 independence referendum, this paper argues that divisions between factional leaders affect a group's choice to take risks, reducing its likelihood. Consequently, conditions are less likely to reach the point of existential danger where outside intervention becomes necessary.