z-logo
Premium
Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 3a clinical trial
Author(s) -
Shuai Ying,
Yang Gangyi,
Zhang Qiu,
Li Wei,
Luo Yong,
Ma Jianhua,
Chen Daoxiong,
Yang Jialin,
Wang Xinjun,
Hu Ji,
Xu Ning,
Yang Wenying
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.14198
Subject(s) - placebo , medicine , nausea , vomiting , clinical endpoint , adverse effect , gastroenterology , type 2 diabetes , randomized controlled trial , diabetes mellitus , endocrinology , alternative medicine , pathology
Abstract Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEX168) monotherapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients in China. Materials and Methods In a multicentred, randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled phase 3a clinical trial, 361 patients with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.0%‐10.5%, fasting plasma glucose <13.9 mmol/L) were randomized (1:1:1) for weekly subcutaneous injections: placebo, PEX168/100 μg or PEX168/200 μg. The 24‐week treatment was followed by a 28‐week extension, during which placebo‐treated patients were randomly assigned to PEX168/100 μg or PEX168/200 μg. The primary efficacy endpoint was the HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Results The three groups had similar demographics and baseline characteristics. The HbA1c least‐square mean (95% CI) change from baseline to week 24 was greater for PEX168/100 μg (−1.02% [−1.21%, −0.83%]) and PEX168/200 μg (−1.34% [−1.54%, −1.15%]) than for placebo (−0.17% [−0.36%, 0.02%]); (superiority: P  < .0001). The proportions of patients with less than 7% HbA1c in the placebo, PEX168/100 μg and PEX168/200 μg groups were 15.7%, 34.7% and 46.6%, respectively. Common gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were nausea (5.6%, 10.0% and 0% for PEX168/100 μg, PEX168/200 μg and placebo, respectively) and vomiting (2.4%, 8.3% and 0% for PEX168/100 μg, PEX168/200 μg and placebo, respectively). Six (1.6%) patients (PEX168/100 μg: N = 2 [1.6%], PEX168/200 μg: N = 3 [2.5%] and placebo: N = 1 [0.8%]) discontinued treatment because of AEs. Four (1.2%) patients (PEX168/100 μg: N = 3 [2.5%] and PEX168/200 μg: N = 1 [0.9%]) developed PEX168 antidrug antibodies. Conclusion PEX168 monotherapy significantly improved glycaemic control in T2D patients with a safety profile resembling that of other glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom