Premium
Efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients: A multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase 3a clinical trial
Author(s) -
Shuai Ying,
Yang Gangyi,
Zhang Qiu,
Li Wei,
Luo Yong,
Ma Jianhua,
Chen Daoxiong,
Yang Jialin,
Wang Xinjun,
Hu Ji,
Xu Ning,
Yang Wenying
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.14198
Subject(s) - placebo , medicine , nausea , vomiting , clinical endpoint , adverse effect , gastroenterology , type 2 diabetes , randomized controlled trial , diabetes mellitus , endocrinology , alternative medicine , pathology
Abstract Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of polyethylene glycol loxenatide (PEX168) monotherapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients in China. Materials and Methods In a multicentred, randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled phase 3a clinical trial, 361 patients with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.0%‐10.5%, fasting plasma glucose <13.9 mmol/L) were randomized (1:1:1) for weekly subcutaneous injections: placebo, PEX168/100 μg or PEX168/200 μg. The 24‐week treatment was followed by a 28‐week extension, during which placebo‐treated patients were randomly assigned to PEX168/100 μg or PEX168/200 μg. The primary efficacy endpoint was the HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Results The three groups had similar demographics and baseline characteristics. The HbA1c least‐square mean (95% CI) change from baseline to week 24 was greater for PEX168/100 μg (−1.02% [−1.21%, −0.83%]) and PEX168/200 μg (−1.34% [−1.54%, −1.15%]) than for placebo (−0.17% [−0.36%, 0.02%]); (superiority: P < .0001). The proportions of patients with less than 7% HbA1c in the placebo, PEX168/100 μg and PEX168/200 μg groups were 15.7%, 34.7% and 46.6%, respectively. Common gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) were nausea (5.6%, 10.0% and 0% for PEX168/100 μg, PEX168/200 μg and placebo, respectively) and vomiting (2.4%, 8.3% and 0% for PEX168/100 μg, PEX168/200 μg and placebo, respectively). Six (1.6%) patients (PEX168/100 μg: N = 2 [1.6%], PEX168/200 μg: N = 3 [2.5%] and placebo: N = 1 [0.8%]) discontinued treatment because of AEs. Four (1.2%) patients (PEX168/100 μg: N = 3 [2.5%] and PEX168/200 μg: N = 1 [0.9%]) developed PEX168 antidrug antibodies. Conclusion PEX168 monotherapy significantly improved glycaemic control in T2D patients with a safety profile resembling that of other glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists.