Premium
Peri‐transplant glycaemic control as a predictor of pancreas transplant survival
Author(s) -
Shapey Iestyn M.,
Tan Zheng L.,
Gioco Rossella,
Khambalia Hussein,
Fullwood Catherine,
Yiannoullou Petros,
Summers Angela,
Hanley Neil A.,
Augustine Titus,
Rutter Martin K.,
Dellen David
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.14181
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , perioperative , area under the curve , transplantation , diabetes mellitus , pancreas transplantation , proportional hazards model , urology , surgery , gastroenterology , endocrinology , kidney transplantation
Abstract Aims The relationship between peri‐transplant glycaemic control and outcomes following pancreas transplantation is unknown. We aimed to relate peri‐transplant glycaemic control to pancreas graft survival and to develop a framework for defining early graft dysfunction. Methods Peri‐transplant glycaemic control profiles over the first 5 days postoperatively were determined by an area under the curve [AUC; average daily glucose level (mmol/L) × time (days)] and the coefficient of variation of mean daily glucose levels. Peri‐transplant hyperglycaemia was defined as an AUC ≥35 mmol/day/L (daily mean blood glucose ≥7 mmol/L). Risks of graft failure associated with glycaemic control and variability and peri‐transplant hyperglycaemia were determined using covariate‐adjusted Cox regression. Results We collected 7606 glucose readings over 5 days postoperatively from 123 pancreas transplant recipients. Glucose AUC was a significant predictor of graft failure during 3.6 years of follow‐up (unadjusted HR [95% confidence interval] 1.17 [1.06‐1.30], P = .002). Death censored non‐technical graft failure occurred in eight (10%) recipients with peri‐transplant normoglycaemia, and eight (25%) recipients with peri‐transplant hyperglycaemia such that hyperglycaemia predicted a 3‐fold higher risk of graft failure [HR (95% confidence interval): 3.0 (1.1‐8.0); P = .028]. Conclusion Peri‐transplant hyperglycaemia is strongly associated with graft loss and could be a valuable tool guiding individualized graft monitoring and treatment. The 5‐day peri‐transplant glucose AUC provides a robust and responsive framework for comparing graft function.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom