Premium
Exenatide extended release in patients with type 1 diabetes with and without residual insulin production
Author(s) -
Herold Kevan C.,
Reynolds Jesse,
Dziura James,
Baidal David,
Gaglia Jason,
Gitelman Stephen E.,
Gottlieb Peter A.,
Marks Jennifer,
Philipson Louis H.,
PopBusui Rodica,
Weinstock Ruth S.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.14121
Subject(s) - exenatide , placebo , medicine , confidence interval , type 2 diabetes , agonist , randomized controlled trial , endocrinology , diabetes mellitus , gastroenterology , glycated hemoglobin , randomization , urology , receptor , alternative medicine , pathology
Aims To test whether a long‐acting GLP‐1 receptor agonist would improve glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to determine whether the presence of residual beta cell function would affect the response. In addition, we sought to determine whether the drug would affect beta cell function. Methods We performed a randomized placebo‐controlled trial of exenatide extended release (ER) in participants with T1D with and without detectable levels of C‐peptide. Seventy‐nine participants were randomized to exenatide ER 2 mcg weekly, or placebo, stratified by the presence or absence of detectable C‐peptide levels. The primary outcome was the difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 24 weeks. Participants were followed for another 6 months off study drug. Results At week 24, the time of the primary outcome, the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c level was 7.76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.42, 8.10) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.0% (95% CI 7.64, 8.35) in the placebo group ( P = 0.08). At week 12 the LS mean HbA1c levels were 7.71% (95% CI 7.37, 8.05) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.05% (95% CI 7.7, 8.4) in the placebo group ( P = 0.01). The improvement at week 12 was driven mainly by those with detectable levels of C‐peptide. Those treated with exenatide ER lost weight at 12 and 24 weeks compared to those treated with placebo ( P <0.001 and P = 0.007). The total insulin dose was lower, but not when corrected for body weight, and was not affected by residual insulin production. Adverse events were more frequent with exenatide ER, but hypoglycaemia was not increased. Conclusion Treatment with exenatide ER may have short‐term benefits in some individuals with T1D who are overweight or who have detectable levels of C‐peptide, but short‐term improvements were not sustained.