Premium
Cardiovascular protection with sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: Does it apply to all patients?
Author(s) -
Giorgino Francesco,
Vora Jiten,
Fenici Peter,
Solini Anna
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.14055
Subject(s) - medicine , canagliflozin , myocardial infarction , heart failure , type 2 diabetes , diabetes mellitus , observational study , disease , stroke (engine) , clinical trial , adverse effect , intensive care medicine , cardiology , endocrinology , mechanical engineering , engineering
Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cardiovascular risk in these patients should be considered as a continuum, and comprehensive treatment strategies should aim to target multiple disease risk factors. Large‐scale clinical trials of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown an impact on cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death, which appears to be independent of their glucose‐lowering efficacy. Reductions in major cardiovascular events appear to be greatest in patients with established CVD, particularly those with prior myocardial infarction, but are independent of heart failure or renal risk. Most large‐scale trials of SGLT2 inhibitors predominantly include patients with T2D with pre‐existing CVD and high cardiovascular risk at baseline, limiting their applicability to patients typically observed in clinical practice. Real‐world evidence from observational studies suggests that there might also be beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on heart failure hospitalization and all‐cause mortality in various cohorts of lower risk patients. The most common adverse events reported in clinical and observational studies are genital infections; however, the overall risk of these events appears to be low and easily managed. Similar safety profiles have been reported for elderly and younger patients. There is still some debate regarding the safety of canagliflozin in patients at high risk of fracture and amputation. Outstanding questions include specific patterns of cardiovascular protection according to baseline risk.