z-logo
Premium
Combined continuous glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin infusion versus self‐monitoring of blood glucose with optimized multiple injections in people with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial
Author(s) -
Dicembrini Ilaria,
Pala Laura,
Caliri Mariasmeralda,
Minardi Silvia,
Cosentino Claudia,
Monami Matteo,
Mannucci Edoardo
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.14028
Subject(s) - medicine , crossover study , randomized controlled trial , continuous glucose monitoring , glycated haemoglobin , type 1 diabetes , regimen , diabetes mellitus , bolus (digestion) , type 2 diabetes , blood glucose self monitoring , insulin , insulin pump , placebo , endocrinology , alternative medicine , pathology
Aim To investigate the efficacy of a combination of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus an optimized degludec‐based multiple daily injections (MDI) regimen + self‐monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in people with type 1 diabetes with regard to optimizing glucose control. Material and methods The trial included 28 individuals who underwent a 4‐week run‐in phase, and were then randomized 1:1 to: (a) CSII + CGM followed by MDI + SMBG or (b) an MDI basal‐bolus regimen followed by CSII + CGM. Results In patients randomized to the CSII + CGM → MDI + SMBG arm, a significant reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) versus baseline was found at the end of the first phase (CSII + CGM) without significant variation in the following MDI + SMBG phase. In the arm randomized to the MDI + SMBG → CSII + CGM sequence, a significant improvement in HbA1c was observed in the first phase (MDI + SMBG), together with a further decrease in the following CSII + CGM phase. In the comparison of the two treatments using a mixed linear model, CSII + CGM was superior to MDI + SMBG with respect to change in HbA1c ( P = 0.001). Conclusions This study suggests that CSII + CGM improves glycaemic control without relevant safety issues in type 1 diabetes, in comparison with MDI + SMBG.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom