z-logo
Premium
Incidence and severity of hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes by treatment regimen: A UK multisite 12‐month prospective observational study
Author(s) -
Dunkley Alison J.,
Fitzpatrick Claire,
Gray Laura J.,
Waheed Ghazala,
Heller Simon R.,
Frier Brian M.,
Davies Melanie J.,
Khunti Kamlesh
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.13690
Subject(s) - medicine , observational study , incidence (geometry) , regimen , type 2 diabetes , diabetes mellitus , pediatrics , prospective cohort study , intensive care medicine , endocrinology , optics , physics
Aims To determine the incidence and severity of self‐reported hypoglycaemia in a primary care population with type 2 diabetes. The study also aimed to compare incidence by treatment regimen. Materials and methods A prospective observational study in 17 centres throughout the UK was conducted. Recruitment was based on treatment regimen (metformin alone, sulphonylurea‐, insulin‐ or incretin‐based therapy). Participants were asked to keep a blood glucose diary and self‐report hypoglycaemia episodes [non‐severe (self‐treated) and severe (requiring external help)] over a 12‐month period. Results Three hundred and twenty‐five participants were enrolled, of whom 274 (84%) returned ≥1 monthly diaries. Overall, 39% reported experiencing hypoglycaemia; 32% recorded ≥1 symptomatic, 36% ≥1 non‐severe, and 7% ≥1 severe episodes. By treatment, incidence (events per person/year) for any hypoglycaemia type was 4.39 for insulin, 2.34 for sulphonylurea, 0.76 for metformin, and 0.56 for incretin‐based therapy. Compared with metformin, risk of non‐severe hypoglycaemia was ~3 times higher for participants on sulphonylureas and > 5 times higher for those on insulin [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3.02 (1.76‐5.18), P  < 0.001, and IRR 5.96 (3.48‐10.2), P  < 0.001, respectively]. For severe episodes, the incidence for sulphonylurea (0.09) was similar to metformin (0.07) and incretin‐based therapy (0.07); for insulin the risk remained almost 5 times higher than metformin [incidence 0.32; IRR 4.55 (1.28‐16.20), P  = 0.019]. Conclusions Hypoglycaemia represents a substantial burden for people with type 2 diabetes. Sulphonylureas and insulin are both associated with a risk of reported non‐severe hypoglycaemia, but only insulin with severe episodes. This suggests the importance of the continued use of sulphonylureas in appropriate patients with type 2 diabetes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom