Premium
Intraperitoneal insulin delivery provides superior glycaemic regulation to subcutaneous insulin delivery in model predictive control‐based fully‐automated artificial pancreas in patients with type 1 diabetes: a pilot study
Author(s) -
Dassau Eyal,
Renard Eric,
Place Jérôme,
Farret Anne,
Pelletier MarieJosé,
Lee Justin,
Huyett Lauren M.,
Chakrabarty Ankush,
Doyle Francis J.,
Zisser Howard C.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/dom.12999
Subject(s) - medicine , artificial pancreas , insulin , diabetes mellitus , type 2 diabetes , insulin delivery , type 1 diabetes , endocrinology
Aims To compare intraperitoneal ( IP ) to subcutaneous ( SC ) insulin delivery in an artificial pancreas ( AP ). Research design and methods Ten adults with type 1 diabetes participated in a non‐randomized, non‐blinded sequential AP study using the same SC glucose sensing and Zone Model Predictive Control ( ZMPC ) algorithm adjusted for insulin clearance. On first admission, subjects underwent closed‐loop control with SC delivery of a fast‐acting insulin analogue for 24 hours. Following implantation of a DiaPort IP insulin delivery system, the identical 24‐hour trial was performed with IP regular insulin delivery. The clinical protocol included 3 unannounced meals with 70, 40 and 70 g carbohydrate, respectively. Primary endpoint was time spent with blood glucose ( BG ) in the range of 80 to 140 mg/ dL (4.4‐7.7 mmol/L). Results Percent of time spent within the 80 to 140 mg/ dL range was significantly higher for IP delivery than for SC delivery: 39.8 ± 7.6 vs 25.6 ± 13.1 ( P = .03). Mean BG (mg/ dL ) and percent of time spent within the broader 70 to 180 mg/ dL range were also significantly better for IP insulin: 151.0 ± 11.0 vs 190.0 ± 31.0 ( P = .004) and 65.7 ± 9.2 vs 43.9 ± 14.7 ( P = .001), respectively. Superiority of glucose control with IP insulin came from the reduced time spent in hyperglycaemia (>180 mg/ dL : 32.4 ± 8.9 vs 53.5 ± 17.4, P = .014; >250 mg/ dL : 5.9 ± 5.6 vs 23.0 ± 11.3, P = .0004). Higher daily doses of insulin ( IU ) were delivered with the IP route (43.7 ± 0.1 vs 32.3 ± 0.1, P < .001) with no increased percent time spent <70 mg/ dL ( IP : 2.5 ± 2.9 vs SC : 4.1 ± 5.3, P = .42). Conclusions Glycaemic regulation with fully‐automated AP delivering IP insulin was superior to that with SC insulin delivery. This pilot study provides proof‐of‐concept for an AP system combining a ZMPC algorithm with IP insulin delivery.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom