Premium
Predictive performance of a genetic risk score using 11 susceptibility alleles for the incidence of Type 2 diabetes in a general Japanese population: a nested case–control study
Author(s) -
Goto A.,
Noda M.,
Goto M.,
Yasuda K.,
Mizoue T.,
Yamaji T.,
Sawada N.,
Iwasaki M.,
Inoue M.,
Tsugane S.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
diabetic medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.474
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1464-5491
pISSN - 0742-3071
DOI - 10.1111/dme.13602
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , single nucleotide polymorphism , type 2 diabetes , nested case control study , prospective cohort study , diabetes mellitus , population , case control study , risk factor , allele , genetics , genotype , endocrinology , biology , environmental health , gene
Aims To assess the predictive ability of a genetic risk score for the incidence of Type 2 diabetes in a general Japanese population. Methods This prospective case–control study, nested within a Japan Public Health Centre‐based prospective study, included 466 participants with incident Type 2 diabetes over a 5‐year period (cases) and 1361 control participants, as well as 1463 participants with existing diabetes and 1463 control participants. Eleven susceptibility single nucleotide polymorphisms, identified through genome‐wide association studies and replicated in Japanese populations, were analysed. Results Most single nucleotide polymorphism loci showed directionally consistent associations with diabetes. From the combined samples, one single nucleotide polymorphism (rs2206734 at CDKAL 1 ) reached a genome‐wide significance level (odds ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.18–1.40; P = 1.8 × 10 –8 ). Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs2206734 in CDKAL 1 , rs2383208 in CDKN 2A/B , and rs2237892 in KCNQ 1 ) were nominally significantly associated with incident diabetes. Compared with the lowest quintile of the total number of risk alleles, the highest quintile had a higher odds of incident diabetes (odds ratio 2.34, 95% CI 1.59–3.46) after adjusting for conventional risk factors such as age, sex and BMI . The addition to the conventional risk factor‐based model of a genetic risk score using the 11 single nucleotide polymorphisms significantly improved predictive performance; the c‐statistic increased by 0.021, net reclassification improved by 6.2%, and integrated discrimination improved by 0.003. Conclusions Our prospective findings suggest that the addition of a genetic risk score may provide modest but significant incremental predictive performance beyond that of the conventional risk factor‐based model without biochemical markers.