z-logo
Premium
Validation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication under Six outcome measure
Author(s) -
ThomasStonell Nancy,
Oddson Bruce,
Robertson Bernadette,
Rosenbaum Peter
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
developmental medicine and child neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.658
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1469-8749
pISSN - 0012-1622
DOI - 10.1111/dmcn.12123
Subject(s) - measure (data warehouse) , outcome (game theory) , focus (optics) , psychology , computer science , mathematics , data mining , physics , mathematical economics , optics
Aim The aim of this study was to establish the construct validity of the F ocus on the O utcomes of C ommunication U nder S ix ( FOCUS © ),a tool designed to measure changes in communication skills in preschool children. Method Participating families' children ( n =97; 68 males, 29 females; mean age 2y 8mo; SD 1.04y, range 10mo–4y 11mo) were recruited through eight C anadian organizations. The children were on a waiting list for speech and language intervention. Parents completed the A ges and S tages Q uestionnaire – S ocial/ E motional ( ASQ ‐ SE ) and the FOCUS three times: at assessment and at the start and end of treatment. A second sample ( n =28; 16 males 12 females) was recruited from another organization to correlate the FOCUS scores with speech, intelligibility and language measures. Second sample participants ranged in age from 3 years 1 month to 4 years 9 months (mean 3y 11mo; SD 0.41y). At the start and end of treatment, children were videotaped to obtain speech and language samples. Parents and speech–language pathologists ( SLP s) independently completed the FOCUS tool. SLP s who were blind to the pre/post order of the videotapes analysed the samples. Results The FOCUS measured significantly more change ( p <0.01) during treatment than during the waiting list period. It demonstrated both convergent and discriminant validity against the ASQ ‐ SE . The FOCUS change corresponded to change measured by a combination of clinical speech and language measures (κ=0.31, p <0.05). Conclusion The FOCUS shows strong construct validity as a change‐detecting instrument.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom