z-logo
Premium
Basilar artery strokes in children: good outcomes with conservative medical treatment
Author(s) -
LagmanBartolome Ana Marissa,
Pontigon AnnMarie,
Moharir Mahendranath,
Macgregor Daune L.,
Askalan Rand,
Yau Ivanna,
Deveber Gabrielle
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
developmental medicine and child neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.658
H-Index - 143
eISSN - 1469-8749
pISSN - 0012-1622
DOI - 10.1111/dmcn.12092
Subject(s) - medicine , pediatric stroke , confidence interval , stroke (engine) , odds ratio , pediatrics , basilar artery , population , tissue plasminogen activator , thrombolysis , ischemic stroke , myocardial infarction , ischemia , mechanical engineering , environmental health , engineering
Aim To describe outcomes and outcome predictors in childhood basilar artery stroke ( BAS ). Method We prospectively enrolled children with BAS with or without basilar artery occlusion ( BAO ) in the T oronto C hildren's S troke R egistry from 1992 to 2009. We assessed presenting features and outcomes including P ediatric S troke O utcome M easure s cores. Results Among 578 children with acute arterial ischemic stroke, 27 had BAS (4.6% including neonates, 6% excluding neonates). Twenty‐four (14 males, 10 females) children met study criteria (mean age at stroke was 8y 10mo; range 0–17y). Eleven children had BAO . Aspirin or anticoagulation was given to 15 children. None received tissue plasminogen activator or endovascular treatments. At mean follow‐up (3y 2mo, range 1mo–11y 8mo), 12 had a ‘good outcome’ (seven normal, five insignificant deficit) and 12 had ‘poor outcome’ (10 moderate or severe deficit, two acute deaths). Larger infarct size (≥50% of axial brainstem diameter) independently predicted poor outcome ( p =0.02; odds ratio 21.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6–274.9) but not BAO , altered level of consciousness, or age. Interpretation Compared with adults, in childhood BAS death is rare and survivors frequently have good outcomes. Aggressive endovascular interventions may not be justifiable in this population.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here