Premium
Simul What? Toward a Grace for the Fearful
Author(s) -
Hughes Krista E.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
dialog
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.114
H-Index - 5
eISSN - 1540-6385
pISSN - 0012-2033
DOI - 10.1111/dial.12295
Subject(s) - compassion , vulnerability (computing) , divine grace , accountability , philosophy , environmental ethics , root (linguistics) , psychology , sociology , aesthetics , epistemology , social psychology , psychoanalysis , theology , law , political science , computer security , computer science , linguistics
The doctrines of forensic justification and simul iustus et peccator assume a primarily moral theo‐cosmology. However, the former constricts the excessiveness of divine grace, while the latter fails to adequately capture the fullness of the human condition. Freeing divine grace and theological anthropology from the moral requires a shift in emphasis toward suffering and an acknowledgment that a deep root of sin is creaturely vulnerability. In this case, the incurved self might symbolize the fearful, pulling goods toward the self for protection. While accountability for sin remains important, the first response to the fearful, who act from a sense of deep vulnerability, is compassion rather than judgment. In this way grace attends to but ultimately exceeds the moral.