Premium
Par‐ aPKC ‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms cooperatively control cell polarity, Hippo signaling, and cell positioning in 16‐cell stage mouse embryos
Author(s) -
Hirate Yoshikazu,
Hirahara Shino,
Inoue Kenichi,
Kiyonari Hiroshi,
Niwa Hiroshi,
Sasaki Hiroshi
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
development, growth and differentiation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.864
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1440-169X
pISSN - 0012-1592
DOI - 10.1111/dgd.12235
Subject(s) - hippo signaling pathway , cell polarity , microbiology and biotechnology , asymmetric cell division , radixin , moesin , biology , cell , inner cell mass , cell fate determination , embryo , ezrin , cell division , signal transduction , transcription factor , blastocyst , embryogenesis , genetics , cytoskeleton , gene
In preimplantation mouse embryos, the Hippo signaling pathway plays a central role in regulating the fates of the trophectoderm ( TE ) and the inner cell mass ( ICM ). In early blastocysts with more than 32 cells, the Par‐ aPKC system controls polarization of the outer cells along the apicobasal axis, and cell polarity suppresses Hippo signaling. Inactivation of Hippo signaling promotes nuclear accumulation of a coactivator protein, Yap, leading to induction of TE ‐specific genes. However, whether similar mechanisms operate at earlier stages is not known. Here, we show that slightly different mechanisms operate in 16‐cell stage embryos. Similar to 32‐cell stage embryos, disruption of the Par‐ aPKC system activated Hippo signaling and suppressed nuclear Yap and Cdx2 expression in the outer cells. However, unlike 32‐cell stage embryos, 16‐cell stage embryos with a disrupted Par‐ aPKC system maintained apical localization of phosphorylated Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin (p‐ ERM ), and the effects on Yap and Cdx2 were weak. Furthermore, normal 16‐cell stage embryos often contained apolar cells in the outer position. In these cells, the Hippo pathway was strongly activated and Yap was excluded from the nuclei, thus resembling inner cells. Dissociated blastomeres of 8‐cell stage embryos form polar–apolar couplets, which exhibit different levels of nuclear Yap, and the polar cell engulfed the apolar cell. These results suggest that cell polarization at the 16‐cell stage is regulated by both Par‐ aPKC ‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms. Asymmetric cell division is involved in cell polarity control, and cell polarity regulates cell positioning and most likely controls Hippo signaling.