Premium
Comparing statistical learning across perceptual modalities in infancy: An investigation of underlying learning mechanism(s)
Author(s) -
Emberson Lauren L.,
Misyak Jennifer B.,
Schwade Jennifer A.,
Christiansen Morten H.,
Goldstein Michael H.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
developmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.801
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1467-7687
pISSN - 1363-755X
DOI - 10.1111/desc.12847
Subject(s) - psychology , amodal perception , stimulus modality , modalities , novelty , perception , cognitive psychology , visual perception , preference , perceptual learning , modality (human–computer interaction) , cognition , auditory perception , developmental psychology , sensory system , neuroscience , artificial intelligence , social psychology , social science , sociology , computer science , economics , microeconomics
Statistical learning (SL), sensitivity to probabilistic regularities in sensory input, has been widely implicated in cognitive and perceptual development. Little is known, however, about the underlying mechanisms of SL and whether they undergo developmental change. One way to approach these questions is to compare SL across perceptual modalities. While a decade of research has compared auditory and visual SL in adults, we present the first direct comparison of visual and auditory SL in infants (8–10 months). Learning was evidenced in both perceptual modalities but with opposite directions of preference: Infants in the auditory condition displayed a novelty preference, while infants in the visual condition showed a familiarity preference. Interpreting these results within the Hunter and Ames model (1988), where familiarity preferences reflect a weaker stage of encoding than novelty preferences, we conclude that there is weaker learning in the visual modality than the auditory modality for this age. In addition, we found evidence of different developmental trajectories across modalities: Auditory SL increased while visual SL did not change for this age range. The results suggest that SL is not an abstract, amodal ability; for the types of stimuli and statistics tested, we find that auditory SL precedes the development of visual SL and is consistent with recent work comparing SL across modalities in older children.