Premium
Clinical impact of surveillance colonoscopy using magnification without diminutive polyp removal
Author(s) -
Ninomiya Yuki,
Oka Shiro,
Tanaka Shinji,
Boda Kazuki,
Yamashita Ken,
Sumimoto Kyoku,
Hirano Daiki,
Tamaru Yuzuru,
Shigita Kenjiro,
Hayashi Nana,
Matsuo Taiji,
Chayama Kazuaki
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
digestive endoscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.5
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1443-1661
pISSN - 0915-5635
DOI - 10.1111/den.12877
Subject(s) - medicine , colonoscopy , adenoma , incidence (geometry) , lesion , diminutive , magnification , carcinoma , chromoendoscopy , pathological , endoscopy , gastroenterology , colorectal cancer , surgery , cancer , linguistics , philosophy , physics , computer science , optics , computer vision
Background and Aim In Western countries, endoscopic removal of all adenomas during colonoscopy is recommended. The present study evaluates the usefulness of magnifying colonoscopy without removal of diminutive (≤5 mm) colorectal polyps. Methods Patients with diminutive polyps who were observed for over 5 years using magnification at Hiroshima University Hospital were selected retrospectively. Lesions ≥6 mm in size, depressed lesions, and lesions with type V pit pattern were indications for endoscopic resection. We investigated the characteristics of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection detected on surveillance colonoscopy and the risk factors for the incidence of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection. Results A total of 706 consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty‐eight lesions indicated for endoscopic resection were detected, averaging 9.0 ± 4.8 mm, and 33 (49%) lesions were located in the right colon. Pathological diagnoses were adenoma, Tis carcinoma, and T1 carcinoma in 58 (85%), eight (12%), and two (3%) lesions, respectively. Five lesions were considered to grow from previously detected diminutive polyps. Relative risks for the incidence of a lesion indicated for endoscopic resection were 1.76 (95% confidence interval [ CI ], 1.004–3.23) for males compared with females, 3.76 (95% CI , 2.03–7.50) for more than three polyps at initial colonoscopy compared with one polyp, and 2.84 (95% CI , 1.43–5.24) for patients with carcinoma at initial colonoscopy compared with patients with no lesion indicated for endoscopic resection. Nine carcinomas were resected endoscopically. Conclusion Diminutive low‐grade adenomas detected by using magnifying colonoscopy may not necessarily require removal.