z-logo
Premium
JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection
Author(s) -
Tanaka Shinji,
Kashida Hiroshi,
Saito Yutaka,
Yahagi Naohisa,
Yamano Hiroo,
Saito Shoichi,
Hisabe Takashi,
Yao Takashi,
Watanabe Masahiko,
Yoshida Masahiro,
Kudo Shinei,
Tsuruta Osamu,
Sugihara Kenichi,
Watanabe Toshiaki,
Saitoh Yusuke,
Igarashi Masahiro,
Toyonaga Takashi,
Ajioka Yoichi,
Ichinose Masao,
Matsui Toshiyuki,
Sugita Akira,
Sugano Kentaro,
Fujimoto Kazuma,
Tajiri Hisao
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
digestive endoscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.5
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1443-1661
pISSN - 0915-5635
DOI - 10.1111/den.12456
Subject(s) - medicine , endoscopic submucosal dissection , endoscopic mucosal resection , endoscopic treatment , colorectal cancer , general surgery , endoscopy , colorectal polyp , surgery , colonoscopy , cancer
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection ( ESD ) has become common in recent years. Suitable lesions for endoscopic treatment include not only early colorectal carcinomas but also many types of precarcinomatous adenomas. It is important to establish practical guidelines in which the preoperative diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia and the selection of endoscopic treatment procedures are properly outlined, and to ensure that the actual endoscopic treatment is useful and safe in general hospitals when carried out in accordance with the guidelines. In cooperation with the J apanese S ociety for C ancer of the C olon and R ectum, the J apanese S ociety of C oloproctology, and the J apanese S ociety of G astroenterology, the J apan G astroenterological E ndoscopy S ociety has recently compiled a set of colorectal ESD /endoscopic mucosal resection ( EMR ) guidelines using evidence‐based methods. The guidelines focus on the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and caveat before, during, and after ESD / EMR and, in this regard, exclude the specific procedures, types and proper use of instruments, devices, and drugs. Although eight areas, ranging from indication to pathology, were originally planned for inclusion in these guidelines, evidence was scarce in each area. Therefore, grades of recommendation were determined largely through expert consensus in these areas.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here