z-logo
Premium
Community Conservation and the (Mis)appropriation of Taboo
Author(s) -
Osterhoudt Sarah R.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
development and change
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.267
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1467-7660
pISSN - 0012-155X
DOI - 10.1111/dech.12413
Subject(s) - taboo , appropriation , reductionism , enthusiasm , ethnography , sociology , work (physics) , environmental ethics , public relations , political science , environmental resource management , epistemology , economics , engineering , social psychology , mechanical engineering , psychology , philosophy , anthropology
ABSTRACT Community conservation initiatives have long struggled to forge productive relationships with the people living in and around protected areas. Currently, there is enthusiasm among conservation researchers and practitioners regarding local cultural taboos, which often appear to conserve species and landscapes of ecological importance. However, in incorporating local taboos into conservation programmes, there is the risk that these culturally sophisticated institutions are used in a highly reductionist manner. Drawing from ethnographic work in Madagascar, this article highlights how the simplification of cultural taboos can exasperate already fraught relationships between communities and conservation organizations, and undermine the very environmental outcomes that groups seek to promote. This reductionist approach can also lead to the harmful appropriation of local meanings and resources. Overall, while working with local taboos may potentially offer an alternative to neoliberal models of conservation, scholars and practitioners should recognize the dynamic and interconnected processes connected with taboos, instead of regarding them as static and interchangeable products .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here