Open AccessAssessing population structure in the face of isolation by distance: Are we neglecting the problem?
Author(s) -
Perez Manolo F.,
Franco Fernando F.,
Bombonato Juliana R.,
Bonatelli Isabel A. S.,
Khan Gulzar,
RomeiroBrito Monique,
Fegies Ana C.,
Ribeiro Paulianny M.,
Silva Gislaine A. R.,
Moraes Evandro M.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
diversity and distributions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.918
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1472-4642
pISSN - 1366-9516
DOI - 10.1111/ddi.12816
Subject(s) - identification (biology) , inference , population , isolation by distance , biodiversity , conservation science , biodiversity conservation , ecology , computer science , geography , data science , genetic structure , biology , medicine , artificial intelligence , environmental health , genetic diversity
Abstract Aim To investigate how the potential bias from isolation by distance ( IBD ) in inferences of population structure has been addressed, in studies aiming biodiversity conservation. Location Global. Methods We reviewed the literature on the impact of IBD on the performance of the widely used software structure . We also performed a literature survey in the Web of Knowledge to assess how data have been analysed in biodiversity conservation studies when IBD is detected. Results By reviewing the literature on structure performance in IBD data sets, we found a high number of studies showing that structure outputs are extremely affected by IBD . This misleading inference results principally in the detection of artificial genetic clusters. The literature survey showed that IBD was present in most data sets (60.56%) and that a substantial number of the articles only tested IBD by Mantel tests (82.21%). The most concerning result is that several articles have been using structure even after detecting IBD (57.99%), and a substantial number of them are drawing formal conservation strategies, notwithstanding the potentially biased results (51.49%). Main conclusions Our results are of great concern, as conservation strategies may be distinct under different population structure, and its success can be affected by the incorrect identification of populations. We recommend possible stages to be considered in the presence of IBD , which can help conservation investigators before the proposition of explicit conservation strategies.