z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Avifauna and urban encroachment in time and space
Author(s) -
Rayner Laura,
Ikin Karen,
Evans Maldwyn J.,
Gibbons Philip,
Lindenmayer David B.,
Manning Adrian D.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
diversity and distributions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.918
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 1472-4642
pISSN - 1366-9516
DOI - 10.1111/ddi.12293
Subject(s) - woodland , geography , habitat , ecology , biodiversity , biota , urbanization , urban planning , extinction debt , urban ecosystem , habitat destruction , biology
Aim Urban expansion significantly alters fringe environments often with undesirable impacts on biodiversity. Consequently, there is a need to define clear conservation objectives for areas subject to urban encroachment. Urban fringe development is a highly dynamic process, both spatially and temporally, but few studies are equipped to examine its temporal effects on biota. We aimed to explore the impacts of urban encroachment on avifauna through space and time. Location The Australian Capital Territory, Australia. Methods We used records from an extensive 14‐year monitoring programme undertaken in temperate woodland. We fitted hierarchical generalized linear models to assess individual species responses to the distance from monitoring sites to the urban boundary, and the temporal rate of change in this distance through time. We used factorial analysis on mixed data to examine trait group responses to these predictors. Results Our results indicated that the occurrence of approximately half of the study region's avifauna is strongly linked to the proximity of their habitat to the urban fringe, but that the impact of urban fringe development on the occurrence of some species changed through time. We identified several species of conservation concern that respond negatively to large annual increases in urban fringe development, irrespective of its proximity to suitable habitat. Species responses to urban proximity were linked to life history traits, with small, migratory, woodland‐dependent species that rely on mid‐ and upper‐canopy structures, clearly disadvantaged by urban environments. Main conclusions Our findings demonstrate the breadth of species responses to urban encroachment over much larger distances than is typically investigated in urban ecological studies. We identify guilds vulnerable to the impacts of urban fringe development and therefore in need of ecologically sensitive urban design. We argue that future urban expansion towards important fringe habitats will need to be planned strategically through space and time.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here