z-logo
Premium
Quality of life and psychosocial impact of scarring and non‐scarring alopecia in women
Author(s) -
Katoulis Alexandros C.,
Christodoulou Christos,
Liakou Aikaterini I.,
Kouris Anargyros,
Korkoliakou Panagiota,
Kaloudi Eythymia,
Kanelleas Antonios,
Papageorgiou Charalabos,
Rigopoulos Dimitrios
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
jddg: journal der deutschen dermatologischen gesellschaft
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1610-0387
pISSN - 1610-0379
DOI - 10.1111/ddg.12548
Subject(s) - psychosocial , medicine , dermatology life quality index , quality of life (healthcare) , hospital anxiety and depression scale , anxiety , depression (economics) , loneliness , ucla loneliness scale , dermatology , psychiatry , psoriasis , nursing , macroeconomics , economics
Summary Background Alopecia is a common dermatological condition with mostly cosmetic consequences that, nevertheless, has significant psychological and psychosocial impact. Objective To assess the impact of alopecia on quality of life and certain psychological domains and to compare it between scarring and non‐scarring alopecia in Greek adult women. Patients and methods Forty‐four women, aged 18–70 years, with scarring (n = 19) or non‐scarring alopecia (n = 25) were recruited. All patients were evaluated by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Rosenberg Self‐esteem Scale (RSES) and UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA‐LS). Results Women with scarring alopecia had higher scores in DLQI, HADS and UCLA‐ LS and lower scores in RSES, compared to women with non‐scarring alopecia. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was documented for DLQI (p = 0.0067), HADS (p = 0.0008), and HADS‐Anxiety (HADS‐A) (p < 0.05) and HADS‐Depression (HADS‐D) (p < 0.01) subscales. Conclusions The psychological burden is heavier and quality of life is more severely impaired among women with scarring alopecia compared with non‐scarring alopecia, probably depicting the poorer prognosis of the former.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here