Premium
Drinkers' identification with varying alcohol consumption prototypes
Author(s) -
Pettigrew Simone,
Jongenelis Michelle I.,
Pratt Iain S.,
Slevin Terry,
Chikritzhs Tanya
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
drug and alcohol review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.018
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1465-3362
pISSN - 0959-5236
DOI - 10.1111/dar.12466
Subject(s) - harm , binge drinking , alcohol consumption , alcohol , consumption (sociology) , environmental health , risk perception , psychology , perception , harm reduction , human factors and ergonomics , medicine , poison control , clinical psychology , social psychology , public health , social science , biochemistry , chemistry , nursing , neuroscience , sociology
and Aims Efforts to reduce excessive alcohol consumption need to take into account drinkers' perceptions of their risk of alcohol‐related harm. The aim of the present study was to profile adult Australian drinkers according to their self‐identification with various drinker prototypes to determine the extent to which these prototypes are associated with perceived and actual risk of alcohol‐related harm. Design and Methods A large web panel provider disseminated an online survey to a national sample of 2168 drinkers aged 18+ years who consumed alcohol at least twice per month. Respondents reported whether they considered themselves to be a light, occasional, social, heavy or binge drinker. The nominated category was compared with perceived and actual risk of alcohol‐related harm. Results The prototype most commonly nominated by respondents was ‘social drinker’ (45%), and the least common was ‘binge drinker’ (7%). Although the heaviest drinkers in terms of actual reported consumption typically selected prototypes indicative of harmful consumption, many of those selecting prototypes indicative of moderate consumption were at risk of alcohol‐related harm. Discussion and Conclusions Many adult drinkers may be unaware of their risk of alcohol‐related harm. The results suggest that there may be a need to recalibrate Australian drinkers' perceptions of high‐risk drinking. [Pettigrew S, Jongenelis MI, Pratt IS, Slevin T, Chikritzhs T. Drinkers' identification with varying alcohol consumption prototypes. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;36:464‐467]