Premium
Assessing competency for remote telecytology rapid on‐site evaluation using pre‐recorded dynamic video streaming
Author(s) -
Monaco Sara E.,
Han Min,
Dietz Robin,
Xing Juan,
Cuda Jacqueline,
Pantanowitz Liron
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1365-2303
pISSN - 0956-5507
DOI - 10.1111/cyt.12794
Subject(s) - test (biology) , medicine , clips , medical physics , multimedia , tutor , popularity , computer science , surgery , psychology , paleontology , social psychology , biology , programming language
Telecytology using real‐time microscopy has gained popularity for rapid on‐site evaluations (ROSE). Although proficiency testing is routinely used in cytopathology, no established means of competency assessment is currently available for telecytology. Our aim was to determine the feasibility of a dynamic (real‐time) platform to assess telecytology competency. Methods Remote Medical Technology dynamic (real‐time) video streaming platform for ROSE is used at our institution, and short video clips of telecytology cases were recorded using Camtasia Studio 8 software during different ROSE sessions. Selected MP4 videos (range 13‐88 seconds, mean 33 seconds), along with clinical histories, were used to build a multiple‐choice question test with one training case and 20 test cases, utilising Tutor (Philips) software to host the web‐based test. The test was voluntary for cytopathologists and cytotechnologists. Answers and feedback from test takers were analysed. Results Thirteen participants—four cytopathologists and nine cytotechnologists—previously trained to use telecytology, volunteered to take the test. Individual scores ranged from 10 (50%) to 19 (95%) with a median of 16 (80%). Most feedback received involved technical difficulties. Conclusions We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first tool to assess telecytology competency for ROSE using pre‐recorded dynamic streaming videos. Despite technical challenges related to incorporating videos into a web‐based test, the test was feasible and provided users with valuable feedback about their ROSE performance. Future effort will be devoted to establishing a more user‐friendly test platform and establishing a benchmark for passing scores.