z-logo
Premium
An automated quantitative DNA image cytometry system detects abnormal cells in cervical cytology with high sensitivity
Author(s) -
Wong O. G.,
Ho M. W.,
Tsun O. K.,
Ng A. K.,
Tsui E. Y.,
Chow J. N.,
Ip P. P.,
Cheung A. N.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1365-2303
pISSN - 0956-5507
DOI - 10.1111/cyt.12540
Subject(s) - squamous intraepithelial lesion , medicine , genotyping , cytology , cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , biopsy , liquid based cytology , pathology , squamous carcinoma , cervical cancer , carcinoma , gynecology , cancer , genotype , biology , gene , biochemistry
Objective To evaluate the performance of an automated DNA ‐image‐cytometry system as a tool to detect cervical carcinoma. Methods Of 384 liquid‐based cervical cytology samples with available biopsy follow‐up were analyzed by both the Imager System and a high‐risk HPV test (Cobas). Results The sensitivity and specificity of Imager System for detecting biopsy proven high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion ( HSIL , cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [ CIN] 2‐3) and carcinoma were 89.58% and 56.25%, respectively, compared to 97.22% and 23.33% of HPV test but additional HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 69.58%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Imager System for predicting HSIL + ( CIN 2‐3+) lesions among atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance samples were 80.00% and 70.53%, respectively, compared to 100% and 11.58% of HPV test whilst the HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 77.89%. Among atypical squamous cells‐cannot exclude HSIL , the sensitivity and specificity of Imager System for predicting HSIL + ( CIN 2‐3+) lesions upon follow up were 82.86% and 33.33%%, respectively, compared to 97.14% and 4.76% of HPV test and the HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 19.05%. Among low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases, the sensitivity and specificity of the Imager System for predicting HSIL + ( CIN 2‐3+) lesions were 66.67% and 35.71%%, respectively, compared to 66.67% and 29.76% of HPV test while HPV 16/18 genotyping increased the specificity to 79.76%. The overall results of imager and high‐risk HPV test agreed in 69.43% (268) of all samples. Conclusions The automated imager system and HPV 16/18 genotyping can enhance the specificity of detecting HSIL + ( CIN 2‐3+) lesions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom