Premium
Microfluidics enables multiplex evaluation of the same cells for further studies
Author(s) -
Mojica W. D.,
Oh K. W.,
Lee H.,
Furlani E. P.,
Sykes D.,
Sands A. M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1365-2303
pISSN - 0956-5507
DOI - 10.1111/cyt.12255
Subject(s) - cytopathology , multiplex , microfluidics , medicine , computational biology , pathology , cytology , nanotechnology , biomedical engineering , computer science , biology , bioinformatics , materials science
Objective The continuous discovery of biomarkers and their evolving use for the diagnosis and guidance of therapy for patients with cancer has increased awareness of the need to triage biospecimens properly. On occasion, cytology samples are the only type of biospecimen available for analysis. Often, the current approach for these latter specimens is cytopathology‐centric, with cells limited to examination by bright field microscopy. When specimens are paucicellular, there is often insufficient material for ancillary testing. Therefore, a need exists to develop an alternative approach that allows for the multiplexed analysis of cells when they are limited in number. In recent previous publications, we demonstrated that clinically derived cells from tissue are suitable for evaluation in a microfluidic device. In our current endeavour, we seek to expand upon those findings and determine if those same cells can be recovered for further analysis. Methods A microfluidic channel was designed, fabricated and tested using cytology specimens generated from tissue specimens. The cytological features of the cells tested were examined prior to entering the channel; they were then compared to similar cells while in the channel, and upon recovery from the channel. Recovery of DNA and proteins were also tested. Results The morphology of the tested cells was not compromised in either the channel or upon recovery. More importantly, the integrity of the cells remained intact, with the recovery of proteins and high molecular weight DNA possible. Conclusions We developed and tested an alternative approach to the processing of cytopathology specimens that enables multiplexed evaluation. Using microfluidics, cytological examination of biopecimens can be performed, but in contrast to existing approaches, the same cells examined can be recovered for downstream analysis.