Premium
Terminology for melanocytic skin lesions and the MPATH‐Dx classification schema: A survey of dermatopathologists
Author(s) -
Radick Andrea C.,
Reisch Lisa M.,
Shucard Hannah L.,
Piepkorn Michael W.,
Kerr Kathleen F.,
Elder David E.,
Barnhill Raymond L.,
Knezevich Stevan R.,
Oster Natalia,
Elmore Joann G.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of cutaneous pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1600-0560
pISSN - 0303-6987
DOI - 10.1111/cup.13873
Subject(s) - terminology , medicine , dermatopathology , documentation , dermatology , pathology , medical physics , computer science , philosophy , linguistics , programming language
Background Diagnostic terms used in histopathology reports of cutaneous melanocytic lesions are not standardized. We describe dermatopathologists' views regarding diverse diagnostic terminology and the utility of the Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MPATH‐Dx) for categorizing melanocytic lesions. Methods July 2018‐2019 survey of board‐certified and/or fellowship‐trained dermatopathologists with experience interpreting melanocytic lesions. Results Among 160 participants, 99% reported witnessing different terminology being used for the same melanocytic lesion. Most viewed diverse terminology as confusing to primary care physicians (98%), frustrating to pathologists (83%), requiring more of their time as a consultant (64%), and providing necessary clinical information (52%). Most perceived that adoption of the MPATH‐Dx would: improve communication with other pathologists and treating physicians (87%), generally be a change for the better (80%), improve patient care (79%), be acceptable to clinical colleagues (68%), save time in pathology report documentation (53%), and protect from malpractice (51%). Conclusions Most dermatopathologists view diverse terminology as contributing to miscommunication with clinicians and patients, adversely impacting patient care. They view the MPATH‐Dx as a promising tool to standardize terminology and improve communication. The MPATH‐Dx may be a useful supplement to conventional pathology reports. Further revision and refinement are necessary for widespread clinical use.