Premium
Acute cutaneous graft‐vs.‐host disease compared to drug hypersensitivity reaction with vacuolar interface changes: a blinded study of microscopic and immunohistochemical features
Author(s) -
Lehman Julia S.,
Gibson Lawrence E.,
elAzhary Rokea A.,
Chavan Rahul N.,
Hashmi Shahrukh K.,
Lohse Christine M.,
Flotte Thomas J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of cutaneous pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1600-0560
pISSN - 0303-6987
DOI - 10.1111/cup.12427
Subject(s) - medicine , graft versus host disease , pathology , spongiosis , interleukin 3 receptor , disease , biopsy , transplantation , skin biopsy , immunology , antigen
Background Complications from graft‐vs.‐host disease ( GVHD ), a major contributor to morbidity and mortality following hematopoietic cell transplantation, may be mitigated by early diagnosis and intervention. However, differentiation between acute cutaneous GVHD and other common skin eruptions that develop in the post‐transplantation period, such as drug hypersensitivity reaction, can be challenging clinically and microscopically. Because recent evidence indicates that CD123 , a marker of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, can help to distinguish gastrointestinal GVHD from the clinicopathologic mimic cytomegalovirus colitis, we aimed to determine whether CD123 could aid in the diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD . Methods We studied 12 skin specimens of patients with grades I–II cutaneous GVHD and 12 from patients who had drug hypersensitivity reaction with vacuolar interface changes on biopsy. Results No differences were seen between the two groups with regards to density or distribution of CD123 expression. Specimens representing GVHD showed significantly less spongiosis (P < 0.001) and fewer dermal eosinophils (P = 0.03) compared to those representing drug hypersensitivity reaction. Conclusions We conclude that CD123 does not appear to be a useful ancillary test in the diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD . Careful correlation between clinical findings and features with microscopy remains the cornerstone of accurate diagnosis of acute cutaneous GVHD .