z-logo
Premium
Randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of everolimus and low‐exposure tacrolimus on graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients
Author(s) -
Taber David J.,
Chokkalingam Avudaiappan,
Su Zemin,
Self Sally,
Miller Dylan,
Srinivas Titte
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1111/ctr.13679
Subject(s) - medicine , tacrolimus , everolimus , randomized controlled trial , kidney transplant , kidney transplantation , renal transplant , urology , kidney , intensive care medicine , transplantation , surgery
This was a single‐center, randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a 3‐month (10‐16 weeks) conversion to everolimus with low‐exposure tacrolimus, as compared to remaining on full exposure tacrolimus with mycophenolate (NCT 02096107). Adult kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft were eligible for participation. Goal troughs in the intervention arm were 2‐5 ng/mL for tacrolimus and 3‐8 ng/mL for everolimus, with tacrolimus maintained at 5‐12 ng/mL in the control arm; 60 were randomized (30 in each arm) and were well matched at baseline; mean age was 51 years and 57% were African‐American. At 12‐months, fibrosis scores (27.8% tacrolimus/mycophenolate vs 22.9% tacrolimus/everolimus, P  = .391), acute rejection rates (7% tacrolimus/mycophenolate vs 3% tacrolimus/everolimus, P  = .554), and graft function (mean eGFR tacrolimus/mycophenolate 56 ± 15 vs tacrolimus/everolimus 59 ± 14 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P  = .465) were similar between arms. The everolimus arm had significantly lower rates of CMV infection, severe BK infection, and improved BK viral clearance kinetics, as compared to the MPA arm. In this population, including a significant number of African‐Americans, an immunosuppression regimen of everolimus with low‐exposure tacrolimus provided similar efficacy to tacrolimus and mycophenolate, with significantly lower rates of BK and CMV.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here