z-logo
Premium
Perspectives on implementing mobile health technology for living kidney donor follow‐up: In‐depth interviews with transplant providers
Author(s) -
Eno Ann K.,
Ruck Jessica M.,
Van Pilsum Rasmussen Sarah E.,
Waldram Madeleine M.,
Thomas Alvin G.,
Purnell Tanjala S.,
Garonzik Wang Jacqueline M.,
Massie Allan B.,
Al Almmary Fawaz,
Cooper Lisa M.,
Segev Dorry L.,
Levan Michael A.,
Henderson Macey L.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1111/ctr.13637
Subject(s) - mhealth , donation , staffing , context (archaeology) , medicine , data collection , internet privacy , nursing , business , computer science , psychological intervention , geography , statistics , mathematics , archaeology , economics , economic growth
Background United States transplant centers are required to report follow‐up data for living kidney donors for 2 years post‐donation. However, living kidney donor (LKD) follow‐up is often incomplete. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies could ease data collection burden but have not yet been explored in this context. Methods We conducted semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with a convenience sample of 21 transplant providers and thought leaders about challenges in LKD follow‐up, and the potential role of mHealth in overcoming these challenges. Results Participants reported challenges conveying the importance of follow‐up to LKDs, limited data from international/out‐of‐town LKDs, and inadequate staffing. They believed the 2‐year requirement was insufficient, but expressed difficulty engaging LKDs for even this short time and inadequate resources for longer‐term follow‐up. Participants believed an mHealth system for post‐donation follow‐up could benefit LKDs (by simplifying communication/tasks and improving donor engagement) and transplant centers (by streamlining communication and decreasing workforce burden). Concerns included cost, learning curves, security/privacy, patient language/socioeconomic barriers, and older donor comfort with mHealth technology. Conclusions Transplant providers felt that mHealth technology could improve LKD follow‐up and help centers meet reporting thresholds. However, designing a secure, easy to use, and cost‐effective system remains challenging.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom