z-logo
Premium
Reply to the letter of Dr Merdin
Author(s) -
Alfano Gaetano,
Fontana Francesco,
Cappelli Gianni
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1111/ctr.13457
Subject(s) - medicine , section (typography) , library science , humanities , art , computer science , business , advertising
Dr Merdin kindly makes suggestions about the design of our study and asks for more information about the infectious and immunosup‐ pressive history of our monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis (MBL) pa‐ tients with monoclonal B‐cell lymphocytosis (MBL). In our study, we incidentally found the coexistence of five cases of MBL and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients at a median of 15 years after transplantation.1 MBL and MGUS are two pre‐ma‐ lignant lymphoproliferative disorders of terminally differentiated B cells. Clinically, MBL and MGUS share common features, such as an indolent course, a late‐onset age distribution, a low rate of progres‐ sion and an increased susceptibility to infections. MBL and MGUS are also the precursor states of two hematologic malignancies: chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM), respectively. Merdin et al2 recently described the clinical presentation of a patient who had both CLL and MM.3,4 Despite the simultaneous oc‐ currence of CLL and MM is extremely rare and has been reported only anecdotally, Rawluk et al3 suggest that the association between these malignancies might be detected more frequently than it was previously if careful monitoring is routinely performed in these subjects. It is unknown whether the coexistence of disorders developing from plasma cells (MGUS and MM) and B cells (MBL and CLL) is a mere coincidence or whether it is the expression of an altered sig‐ naling pathway of a common B‐cell progenitor. The best way to in‐ vestigate their possible clonal relationship is to perform cytogenetic and genomic analyses of the proliferating B cells. Unfortunately, we did not perform the aforementioned analyses in our patients, thus, future studies are necessary to expand knowledge in this field. The immunosuppressive therapy of the five patients is clearly reported in our study. Induction therapy with basiliximab was per‐ formed in only one patient. All the patients were on calcineurin in‐ hibitor (CnI)‐based immunosuppression in combination with steroids at the diagnosis of MBL; only two patients received triple therapy (CnI, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids). The median cyclosporine trough level was in range with the transplant vintage, and no adjunc‐ tive therapies for treating rejections were used. In our patients, over‐ immunosuppression to preserve graft function was avoided, even though we are concerned about the cumulative effect of the pro‐ longed immunosuppressive therapy (more than 15 years) to which the patients were exposed. To date, there is no clear evidence that immunosuppression can elicit the development of MGUS or MBL,5 but we cannot exclude the possibility that long‐term immunosup‐ pression can promote a state of cellular senescence favoring the pro‐ liferation of mature B cells. Regarding the risk of infection, we reported only one case of severe bacterial infection that required hospitalization. The viral replication of cytomegalovirus and Epstein‐Barr virus was clinically asymptomatic and without sequelae. A further case of severe in‐ fection (bacterial sinusitis), successfully treated with antibiotics, oc‐ curred in a male patient after the publication of the article. These few episodes, which are partly favored by chronic immunosuppres‐ sion, do not allow the generalization of our data on the risk of infec‐ tion in patients with MBL.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here