Premium
Antibody depletion strategy for the treatment of suspected antibody‐mediated rejection in lung transplant recipients: Does it work?
Author(s) -
Vacha Mary,
Chery Godefroy,
Hulbert Amanda,
Byrns Jennifer,
Benedetti Clark,
Finlen Copeland Catherine Ashley,
Gray Alice,
Onwuemene Oluwatoyosi,
Palmer Scott M.,
Snyder Laurie D.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1111/ctr.12886
Subject(s) - medicine , rituximab , surgery , lung , transplantation , bortezomib , lung transplantation , gastroenterology , lymphoma , multiple myeloma
Background Donor‐specific antibodies ( DSA s) after lung transplantation correlate with poor outcomes. The ideal treatment strategy for antibody‐mediated rejection AMR is not defined. Our institution implemented an aggressive multimodality protocol for the treatment of suspected AMR . Methods Lung transplant recipients with suspected AMR were treated with a standardized protocol of plasma exchange, steroids, bortezomib, rituximab, and intravenous immune globulin. Primary outcome was DSA clearance at 6 months in those alive. Secondary endpoints included preserved allograft function at 6 months, survival at 6 and 12 months and complications due to the protocol. Results Sixteen lung transplant recipients with documented DSA and allograft dysfunction were included in the analysis. Of the 16 patients, 11 survived to 6 months. Three of those 11 patients (27%) cleared all DSA s within 6 months of the protocol. Four of the 11 patients (36%) had preserved allograft function at 6 months. Overall 12‐month patient survival was 56%. Complications included thrombocytopenia (50%) and abdominal pain or gastrointestinal discomfort (18.7%). Conclusions This multimodality protocol resulted in clearance of DSA s and preserved lung function in a minority of lung transplant recipients with suspected AMR surviving to 6 months after therapy. There were significant side effects of the protocol.