Premium
Comparing 10‐yr renal outcomes in deceased donor and living donor liver transplants
Author(s) -
Sandal Shaifali,
Almudevar Anthony,
Parajuli Sandesh,
Bose Anirban
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1111/ctr.12639
Subject(s) - medicine , incidence (geometry) , dialysis , retrospective cohort study , quartile , surgery , gastroenterology , confidence interval , physics , optics
Few studies have explored whether the type of LT , deceased donor LT ( DDLT ) or living donor LT ( LDLT ), impacts long‐term renal outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 220 LT recipients at our institution to study their renal outcomes at 10 yr. Exclusion criteria were age ≤ 18 yr, graft survival ≤6 months, and multiorgan transplants; 108 DDLT s and 62 LDLT s were eligible. At baseline, DDLT s had a lower eGFR than LDLT s and 10.2% of DDLT s were on dialysis as compared to 0% of LDLT s. At 10 yr, seven DDLT and three LDLT recipients required dialysis or renal transplant (p = 0.75). In recipients with graft survival >6 months, DDLT s had a slower decline in eGFR as compared to LDLT s (p < 0.01). Among LDLT s, the decline in eGFR continued over the entire 10‐yr period, whereas among DDLT s, the decline in eGFR slowed significantly after six months (p = 0.01). This difference between the two groups was not seen among patients in the highest quartile of baseline eGFR . Patient survival and graft survival were similar. In conclusion, the incidence of end‐stage renal disease was similar in both DDLT and LDLT patients, but LDLT recipients seem to have a more sustained decline in eGFR when compared with DDLT recipients.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom