Premium
Treatment of antibody‐mediated rejection in renal transplant patients: a clinical practice survey
Author(s) -
Burton Stephanie A.,
Amir Naaseha,
Asbury Alaina,
Lange Alex,
Hardinger Karen L.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
clinical transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.918
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1399-0012
pISSN - 0902-0063
DOI - 10.1111/ctr.12491
Subject(s) - medicine , rituximab , plasmapheresis , eculizumab , bortezomib , dosing , pharmacy , transplantation , antibody , immunology , family medicine , multiple myeloma , complement system
Preferences for the testing and treatment of antibody‐mediated rejection ( AMR ) in renal transplant patients vary among programs and individual practitioners. The description of these preferences and identification of commonalities can contribute to creating a standard of care. Methods A survey was distributed through the Transplant Listserv of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy ( ACCP ) and via email to members of the American Society of Transplantation Community of Pharmacy ( AST CoP), collected, and analyzed. Results Most clinicians (26/28) test for donor‐specific antibodies ( DSA s) when evaluating a patient with possible AMR . Treatments for AMR varied widely among responding clinicians and included intravenous immune globulin ( IVIG , n = 25), plasmapheresis (n = 24), rituximab (n = 8), bortezomib (n = 4), rabbit antithymocyte globulin (n = 2), and eculizumab (n = 1). Weight‐based dosing of IVIG averaged 1.8 g/kg total dose. Six centers use rituximab as initial therapy, while two use rituximab if other therapy fails. Four centers use bortezomib as initial therapy, while two centers use it for severe/persistent AMR . One center uses eculizumab as initial therapy and one center uses it for severe AMR . Conclusion Methods for the detection of AMR are similar, yet treatment of AMR varies widely. Most centers utilize DSA for detection and a combination of IVIG and plasmapheresis for treatment.