Open AccessApplying a jurisdictional approach to support sustainable seafood
Author(s) -
Kittinger John N.,
Bernard Miranda,
Finkbeiner Elena,
Murphy Erin,
Obregon Pablo,
Klinger Dane H.,
Schoon Michael L.,
Dooley Kevin J.,
Gerber Leah R.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
conservation science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2578-4854
DOI - 10.1111/csp2.386
Subject(s) - sustainability , business , incentive , certification , corporate governance , stewardship (theology) , environmental resource management , environmental economics , environmental stewardship , livelihood , food security , ecosystem services , natural resource economics , ecosystem , economics , finance , ecology , agriculture , management , politics , political science , law , biology , microeconomics
Ensuring the security of ocean ecosystems that provide food and livelihood benefits from seafood systems requires significant investment in improving the sustainability of fisheries and aquaculture production at scale. Seafood certification and ratings systems have established strong benchmarks for sustainability, but markets need to incentivize sustainability throughout the value chain and at relevant ecological scales in order to generate meaningful conservation impacts and support lasting on‐the‐water stewardship efforts. Here, we propose that market‐based approaches and ecosystem‐based governance initiatives can be integrated to improve the sustainability of seafood production systems using a jurisdictional approach. Jurisdictional approaches are place‐based initiatives deployed in key commodity producing regions to drive sustainability through aligned incentives among government, market, and producer actors. To explore the applicability of this approach in seafood, we first identify key mismatches in existing certification and ratings schemes that stymie the effectiveness of market‐based approaches to drive ecosystem‐scale impacts. Subsequently we identify the differentiated incentives for sustainability among producers, supply chain companies, and governments—drawing evidence from research and practice. Based on this analysis, we review the potential for jurisdictional approaches to align actors' incentives for sustainability at the scale of entire production geographies, bringing market‐based approaches and governance improvements together to achieve conservation outcomes.