Open AccessA review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation
Author(s) -
Caravaggi Anthony,
Burton A. Cole,
Clark Douglas A.,
Fisher Jason T.,
Grass Amelia,
Green Sian,
Hobaiter Catherine,
Hofmeester Tim R.,
Kalan Ammie K.,
Rabaiotti Daniella,
Rivet Danielle
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
conservation science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2578-4854
DOI - 10.1111/csp2.239
Subject(s) - wildlife , animal behavior , wildlife conservation , camera trap , wildlife management , ecology , odor , environmental resource management , computer science , environmental science , psychology , biology , zoology , neuroscience
Camera traps (CTs) are an increasingly popular method of studying animal behavior. However, the impact of cameras on detected individuals—such as from mechanical noise, odor, and emitted light—has received relatively little attention. These impacts are particularly important in behavioral studies in conservation that seek to ascribe changes in behavior to relevant environmental factors. In this article, we discuss three sources of bias that are relevant to conservation behavior studies using CTs: (a) disturbance caused by cameras; (b) variation in animal‐detection parameters across camera models; and (c) biased detection across individuals and age, sex, and behavioral classes. We propose several recommendations aimed at mitigating responses to CTs by wildlife. Our recommendations offer a platform for the development of more rigorous and robust behavioral studies using CT technology and, if adopted, would result in greater applied benefits for conservation and management.