Open AccessRapid changes in public perception toward a conservation initiative
Author(s) -
Niemiec Rebecca,
Berl Richard E. W.,
Gonzalez Mireille,
Teel Tara,
Salerno Jonathan,
Breck Stewart,
Camara Cassiopeia,
Collins Matthew,
Schultz Courtney,
Hoag Dana,
Crooks Kevin
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
conservation science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2578-4854
DOI - 10.1111/csp2.12632
Subject(s) - ballot , perception , public opinion , survey data collection , voting , survey methodology , survey research , psychology , social psychology , geography , political science , applied psychology , politics , medicine , statistics , mathematics , pathology , neuroscience , law
Rapid, widespread changes in public perceptions and behaviors have the potential to influence conservation outcomes. However, few studies have documented whether and how such shifts occur throughout the span of a conservation initiative. We examined the 2020 ballot initiative to reintroduce wolves into Colorado, which passed with less support than prior surveys had estimated. We conducted a postelection survey of Colorado residents using the same methods as our preelection survey to compare responses between surveys and to official election results. Reported voting in favor of wolf reintroduction in the postelection survey decreased in comparison to voting intentions shared in the preelection survey, but not enough to reflect the actual vote. While bias from survey methods and/or sampling contributed to differences, we also found evidence that public perception changed. Specifically, beliefs about the potential for negative impacts of wolves increased, while beliefs about the potential for positive impacts of wolves decreased. Our findings highlight the need to conduct longitudinal monitoring of public perception given perceptions may be highly fluid as different entities attempt to sway voters. In addition, to better understand evolving perceptions, survey methods and sampling need to be improved.