Prognosis of hospital‐acquired pneumonia/ventilator‐associated pneumonia with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Klebsiella pneumoniae in intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study
Author(s) -
Chen Shuping,
Zou Dongdong
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
the clinical respiratory journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.789
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1752-699X
pISSN - 1752-6981
DOI - 10.1111/crj.13537
Subject(s) - ventilator associated pneumonia , stenotrophomonas maltophilia , medicine , intensive care unit , pneumonia , retrospective cohort study , klebsiella pneumoniae , hazard ratio , hospital acquired pneumonia , pseudomonas aeruginosa , confidence interval , biology , bacteria , biochemistry , escherichia coli , gene , genetics
We collected data on ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital‐acquired pneumonia (HAP) induced by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) and compared differences between two bacteria in mortality, duration of ventilator use, length of hospital stay, and risk factors for infection. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and to find risk factors of SM‐HAP/VAP versus KP‐HAP/VAP in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the ICU between June 2019 and June 2021 and diagnosed with SM‐HAP/VAP or KP‐HAP/VAP. The primary outcome was 28‐day mortality. Results Ninety‐two HAP/VAP patients (48 with SM‐HAP/VAP and 44 with KP‐HAP/VAP) were included. The 28‐day mortality was 16.7% (8/48 patients) in SM‐HAP/VAP and 15.9% (7/44 patients) in KP‐HAP/VAP ( P = 0.922). After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratios for 28‐day mortality in SM‐HAP/VAP were 1.3 (95% CI:0.5–3.7), 1.0 (95% CI:0.4–3.0), 1.4 (95% CI:0.5–4.0), and 1.1 (95% CI:0.4–3.4), respectively. Conclusion SM‐HAP/VAP and KP‐HAP/VAP patients in ICU might have a similar prognosis in mortality, the total duration of the artificial airway and ventilator use, the total length of ICU stay, and hospital stay. The risk factors of SM‐HAP/VAP versus KP‐HAP/VAP might be the artificial airway, ventilator use, gastric tube placement, acid suppressant and antibiotics (especially carbapenem).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom