Open AccessPerformance of new spirometry reference values in preoperative assessment of lung function
Author(s) -
Vogt Barbara,
Hennig Victoria,
Deuß Kathinka,
Balke Lorenz,
Weiler Norbert,
Frerichs Inéz
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the clinical respiratory journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.789
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1752-699X
pISSN - 1752-6981
DOI - 10.1111/crj.13004
Subject(s) - medicine , spirometry , vital capacity , asymptomatic , airway obstruction , pulmonary function testing , lung function , lung volumes , lung , airway , physical therapy , surgery , asthma , diffusing capacity
Background Pulmonary function is not routinely assessed in patients without respiratory disease and symptoms before surgery, even if they are smokers. We aimed to check whether the new spirometric reference values of the worldwide Global Lung Initiative (GLI) affected the preoperative assessment of lung function in allegedly lung‐healthy patients compared with the still commonly used old predicted values. Methods Two hundred nineteen allegedly lung‐healthy non‐smokers, past and current smokers were examined by spirometry before elective surgery. The obtained values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV 1 ), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV 1 /FVC were transformed into z‐scores according to the GLI guidelines. A comparison between the new and old reference values was performed. FEV 1 was used for the grading of airway obstruction. Results One hundred eighty‐three subjects performed the ventilation manoeuvre according to the GLI recommendations and were analysed. Most non‐smokers and past smokers met the new references ranges for spirometric values. Only z‐scores of FEV 1 /FVC distinguished among all three patient groups, FEV 1 between smokers and the other two groups and FVC did not discriminate the groups, irrespective of the reference values used. Airway obstruction was identified in 24% of asymptomatic smokers by z‐scores of FEV 1 /FVC but in only 14% by the old predicted values. In elderly smokers (>60 years), the corresponding values rose to 50% and 30%. Old predicted values of FEV 1 underestimated the degree of airway obstruction mainly in middle‐aged smokers. Conclusion Allegedly lung‐healthy current smokers showed a higher proportion of preoperatively reduced lung function when z‐scores were used, especially in elderly subjects.